Best Cameras Under $500

The best cameras under $500

Since writing this article on the best cameras under $500, I’ve had a lot of great feedback from happy photographers.

It seems that finding the most affordable way to document memories and create better art is a popular topic!

For newcomers to photography, the assumption is that an expensive camera is required to get great photos…

Thankfully in 2022, this is no longer the case, with some great value for money options available.

Sony a5100

Incredible autofocus, image quality & video in a compact body. Best bang for the buck in 2019.

Check Current Price

Introducing you to a selection of cameras that cost less than $500 is important for me as a professional photographer since I want you to experience photography without the huge price tag.

While there’s plenty of cheap camera gear available, the selection below are cameras I recommend as being excellent value for money.

They give you the best bang for your buck and standing you in good stead as you grow with your photography skills.

N.B. The prices of the product recommendations may have fluctuated above $500 since the time of writing. Click the buttons below to find today’s pricing.

Top 8 Cameras Under $500 in 2022

Image Product Features
shk2-table__imageSony a5100OUR #1 CHOICE
  • Great Image Quality
  • Small & Light
  • Excellent Auto Focus
  • Front Facing Screen
View Price →
shk2-table__imageOlympus E-M10 IITOP-RATED
  • Great Ergonomics
  • Fast Auto Focus
  • Great Lens Selection
  • Small & Light
View Price →
shk2-table__imageCanon G7X IIGREAT VALUE
  • Great Image Quality
  • Easy to Blur Background
  • Robust Build
  • Fast Auto Focus
View Price →
shk2-table__imageNikon D3400BEST NIKON DSLR
  • Smallest/Lightest DSLR
  • Useful Beginner Mode
  • Great Image Quality
  • Good Battery Life
View Price →
shk2-table__imageCanon T6 (1300D)BEST CANON DSLR
  • Great Lens Selection
  • Small & Light
  • Good Battery Life
  • Great Auto Focus
View Price →
shk2-table__imageCanon M100
  • Good Ergonomics
  • Front Facing Screen
  • Great Auto Focus
  • Affordable Lenses
View Price →
shk2-table__imageSony RX100
  • Great Zoom Range
  • Truly Pocketable
  • Great Image Quality
View Price →

I’ve selected the top digital cameras under $500 – the exceptions are where a lens is included in the price, stretching the budget very slightly.

The cameras selected above all offer excellent build quality, image quality, handling and value for money… often performing far better than you’d expect for their sub-$500 price.

To speed your research up, I’ve categorised each section by the most popular camera formats, with a foreword about the benefits of each type:

  • Best DSLR Cameras under $500
  • Best Mirrorless Cameras under $500
  • Best Compact Cameras under $500

If you’re able to stretch your budget a little further, I recommend you check out my guide to mirrorless cameras for beginners and professionals and also this one on the cheapest full frame camera – both investigate a selection of higher-priced cameras which offer more features.

Whilst DSLRs and compact cameras still have their place, investing in one of the latest mirrorless camera systems will help future-proof your purchase. I’ve included a couple below for you to choose from if your budget is limited.

Read on below to see my reviews, including what I consider to be the best camera under $500 of the year so far. I’ve also included some videos on each camera that I think you’ll find useful.

Best DSLR Cameras under $500

Despite the growth in popularity of mirrorless cameras, the humble DSLR camera still has pride of place as the number one format in use by photographers in 2022.

DSLR technology may be getting long in the tooth, but for the time being at least, nothing beats looking through an OVF (Optical ViewFinder) to take a photo.

DSLRs typically offer better ergonomics, longer battery life, more competitive pricing, and better reliability, so recommending a handful of the best DSLR cameras under 500 bucks was a no-brainer.

Nikon D3400 w/ 18-55mm Lens

Nikon D3400 best DSLR under 500

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 24.7
Sensor Size:
4.9 x 3.9 x 3 in. (124 x 98 x 75.5 mm)
445 g ( 15.7 oz )

Let me preface this review with one caveat – you may struggle to get hold of this excellent entry-level Nikon DSLR. At the time of writing, only a few ‘refurbished’ models are available, with the stock quickly dwindling.

The popularity of the Nikon D3400 with 18-55mm lens has mainly been due to its price – for less than $500, you’re getting a helluva-lot of camera for your money!

I’m a big fan of entry-level DSLR cameras. Typically, the technology from the more expensive ‘flag-ship’ models trickles down the ranks, so the cheaper cameras in the line up can also take advantage of class-leading features.

I tested a Nikon D3400 over the holidays and was very impressed with its performance (see my Nikon D3400 review). Coming from a DSLR costing 5x the price, I did of course miss all the bells and whistles of my pro-level camera, but this compact DSLR still did a fine job.

I say ‘compact’, but entry-level DSLRs are more like a jacket-pocket-size. They’re small and light enough to palm easily, but still retain excellent ergonomics, providing adequate comfort for all day shooting – this isn’t the case with most mirrorless cameras and compact cameras.

Nikon D3400 DSLR under 500

With its 24.3MP sensor and high-tech image processor, the Nikon D3400 delivers great looking RAW and JPEG images, which are large enough to allow you to zoom in on all the details.

Having a lot of megapixels allow you to ‘crop’ into a photo after you’ve taken it, effectively allowing you to ‘zoom’ in on your subject and still retain decent quality.

They also allow you to blow up your prints to be displayed on your wall, which is exactly what I intend to do with a shot of my son taken with this camera, like the one below.

Auto-focus on the Nikon D3400 is decent too, with 5 fps continuous shooting – more than enough to keep up with fast-moving kids or pets.

Nikon d3400 best camera 500

The image quality out of the Nikon D3400 is excellent, even with the kit lens | 1/250 f/4 ISO200

One thing to note is that the 11 AF points are quite sparse in frame coverage, so I recommend the focus-recompose technique over individually selecting focus point.

The camera’s ‘guide mode’ is perfect for beginners, teaching you how to shoot in various situations. This is one of the main reasons I chose this as one of the best entry level DSLR cameras.

Battery life is excellent, at approximately 1,200 shots per charge – more than twice as many as most mirrorless cameras, and a huge advantage if you plan to take this camera on holiday.

The Nikon D3400 normally comes bundled with an 18-55mm zoom lens, which is lightweight and a good complement to the camera.

Despite this lens being capable (see my sample images), I recommend upgrading to a ‘prime’ lens as soon as you feel comfortable with the camera since a lens such as the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G (reviewed here) will really open the doors to what is possible with this camera (See: lens recommendations for the Nikon D3400.)

At only 22.8 oz (645 g) with the lens attached, the Nikon D3400 was a joy to use, and I found myself reaching for it far more than my phone when I wanted to take a snap of the kids.

Nikon D3400 review Shotkit-4

The included 18-55mm f/4 ‘kit lens’ did a stellar job, and can even blur the foreground/background | 1/200 f/4 ISO200

You can also take advantage of low-light shooting without having to resort to a flash, thanks to the ISO range of 100 – 25,600.

Realistically, 25,600 will produce a very noisy image, but it’s usually better to have a moment captured ‘noisily’ than nothing at all!

Pro Tip: If there’s a lot of noise in your image (due to using a higher ISO), try changing it to black and white using your image editing program of choice – usually noisy photos look much better with the colours removed.

Nikon ‘Snap-Bridge’ technology is built-in to the D3400, allowing you to transfer images in real time via Bluetooth over to a smartphone or tablet. It’s a fun gimmick, useful perhaps to those who spend a lot of time uploading images to social media.

After my 3 weeks with the Nikon D3400as my holiday camera, I have no hesitation in recommending it as one of the best DSLR cameras under $500 available in 2022 – the only challenge you may have is finding it in stock!

Nikon D5300 w/ 18-55mm Lens

Nikon D5300 best DSLR under 500

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 24.2
Sensor Size:
4.9 x 3.9 x 3 in. (125 x 98 x 76 mm)
Weight: 530 g (1 lb 2.7 oz)

Nikon offers a range of entry-level DSLRs with similar specifications, making the choice of which to buy rather difficult. To make matters harder, several of the DSLRs cost under $500.

If you can’t find the above Nikon D3400 in stock, the next best bet is the Nikon D5300 with 18-55mm lens – in some ways, it’s actually better.

The Nikon D5300 was released 2 years before the D3400, but that doesn’t mean it lacks the latest technology. Strangely enough, it actually has several features that don’t exist in other entry-level DSLRs, including the D3400.

It’s also slightly more expensive, but in my mind, it’s completely worth it.

It still offers that excellent 24MP sensor for rich, vivid and detailed RAW and JPEG files. If you’re going to be spending $500 on a digital camera, you’ll want the images to be much better than your smartphone’s, and thankfully this is the case here.

Nikon D5300 DSLR under 500

There’s also the 5 fps shooting speed, meaning that you can get a succession of 5 shots off a second, perfect for capturing the moment.

However, whereas the D3400 had only 11 AF points, the Nikon D5300 offers 39 AF points which are spread wider across the viewfinder. There’s also Nikon’s excellent 3D-tracking, which senses your subject and tracks it across the frame – perfect for capturing sporting events or fast moving children and pets!

The ISO range runs from 100-12,800, which is less than the D3400’s 25,600 maximum ISO. However, this should be taken with a grain of salt, since on an APS-C camera of this calibre, the sweet spot of low-light ability:image noise is around ISO 6,400, so the higher ISOs are largely left unused.

The main reason I actually prefer the Nikon D5300 over other entry-level Nikon DSLR cameras is the 3.2” articulating screen, which allows you to get more creative with your shooting angles and compositions.

If you’re photographing children, in particular, you’ll want to get down to their height when taking the shot, and the tilting LCD screen helps enormously in getting a quick, candid shot.

Pro Tip: Tilting the screen to face upwards allows you to hold the camera at chest height, and still see the screen to be able to compose the image. This helps you to take candid photos of your subject, who usually won’t notice the camera since it’s held much lower. I do this all the time with my wedding photography and it works a treat!

There’s also built-in GPS on the Nikon D5300, which the D3400 doesn’t offer. This is great for recording where you took your photos whilst on holiday, and Lightroom has a handy map function that will help you organise your photos based on location.


So, what improvements can we see in the 2 years between the release of the Nikon D5300 and the D3400?

Well, battery life is a big one – expect roughly 600 shots out of the D5300, compared to 1,200 from the D3400. Is this a deal breaker? Well, batteries are affordable, so probably not since you can buy a couple. Also, 600 photos in a day is more than enough for most people.

Then there’s a slight weight saving (395 g vs 480 g), and also the difference in price – you’ll see that the Nikon D5300 sometimes creeps a little over $500 with a lens included, but it’s still excellent value for money.

The 18-55mm lens is versatile and delivers great results, but as mentioned before, I’d recommend you invest in the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G to get the most from your camera purchase later down the line.

All in all the Nikon D5300 deserves its spot as one of the best DSLRs under $500, and if your budget allows for it over the D3400, I highly recommend you take a look.

Canon EOS Rebel T6 (EOS 1300D)

Canon Rebel T6

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 18
Sensor Size:
5.08 x 3.99 x 3.06 in. (129 x 101 x 77 mm)
17.11 oz. (485g)

Canon and Nikon offer a lot of bang for your buck in their DSLRs under $500 – they know that if they can get new consumers ‘in’ to their brand at a reasonable price point, they’ll usually have them for life.

Before you read any further, let me just say that if you can find the above Nikons in stock, I think you should consider them before this Canon. The Nikon D5300, in particular, offers a lot better value for the money.

For this reason, I won’t go into a full review of the Canon T6 (aka the EOS 1300D) here. So why am I including it at all then?! Well, two reasons.

First, the Canon T6 was actually named the best DSLR under $500 by DPReview a couple of years ago, and those guys go pretty deep with their review criteria!

Canon Rebel T6 dslr camera

The second reason is that I wanted to include a Canon entry-level DSLR just to give you another option on which to build your camera system.

Later down the line, if you want to invest in other Canon lenses, you’ll find there’s a greater selection with Canon, and often at cheaper prices. There are also many more ‘exotic’ lenses, featuring larger apertures (f/1.2, etc) and crazy wide angles.

Pro Tip: it’s always a good idea when buying a camera to have a think about what lenses you might want in the future. Consider focal lengths, maximum apertures, cost… when you invest in one brand, you usually need to stick to that brand’s lenses, so it’s good to plan ahead.

Click the button below to check out some user reviews on the Canon T6 and make your own mind up. My money would be with the Nikons above, but for diehard Canon fans, the T6 is also a solid investment.

Best Mirrorless Cameras under $500

Mirrorless cameras are the technology of the future. Small, light, and crammed with useful functionality not available on DSLRs, the best mirrorless cameras under $500 deliver a lot for the money.

(If you’re still undecided about what camera format to invest in, read my DSLR vs mirrorless camera buyer’s guide.)

In short, mirrorless cameras offer the main advantage of being able to ‘see’ your exposure before you take the shot. Whereas on a DSLR the viewfinder is essentially a ‘window’, a mirrorless camera offers an electronic viewfinder or an LCD screen, both of which show the effects of aperture, ISO and shutter speed, before you take your image.

There’s no right or wrong here – I love the shooting process with DLSRs as much as I do with mirrorless cameras. However, the format is quickly gaining popularity this year, and the number of amazing mirrorless cameras under $500 in this roundup proves it.

Sony a5100 with 16-50mm Lens

Sony a5100 mirrorless camera under 500

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 24.3
Sensor Size:
4.2 x 2.4 x 1.3 (109 x 62 x 35 mm)
283g (9.9 oz.)

Before you yell, “but where are the cameras under $500?!”, remember that you’re getting a Sony a5100 mirrorless camera body with a lens included. That’s damn good value for money if you ask me!

It has to be said that the top mirrorless cameras under $500 do offer a considerable step up in technology from the dinosaur-like DSLRs.

The autofocus technology on the a5100 is borrowed from much more expensive cameras, and as such, performs surprisingly well.

The Sony a5100 brings 179 AF points and 6 fps to the table, meaning ultra-fast autofocus performance, perfect to capture all of life’s little moments as they happen.

Sharing many features as its elder sibling the excellent Sony a6000 (a camera I highly recommend if you can stretch your budget – check out my Sony a6000 review and this Sony a6000 vs a5100 guide), the Sony a5100 sports a 24.3MP APS-C CMOS sensor with its AF points covering 92% of the frame.

Sony a5100 mirrorless camera under 500 1

What this means is that there’s an AF point ready to be moved exactly where you want focus, or you can let the camera track focus automatically for you, updating the focus point as the subject moves across the frame.

If you’re looking for a compact camera with a viewfinder, you’ll have to look elsewhere since the Sony a5100 only sports a rear LCD display – a gorgeous 3” touchscreen which can flip 180 degrees for simple selfies or for vlogging.

I didn’t mention the video functionality on any of the recommended DSLRs under $500 (despite them all having it), since recording video on a DSLR is inconvenient, to say the least. Auto focus during video isn’t possible with DSLRs at this price point.

On the mirrorless Sony a5100 however, the lack of mirror means autofocus during video recording works well, and the phase-detection AF points track your face around the screen eerily well.

Aside from autofocus that blows DSLRs out the water, the Sony a5100 produces vivid, punchy and detailed JPEGs and RAWs at 24 MP, meaning you can print 300 dpi enlargements at around 20 x 13.3 in.


The 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 kit zoom performs well and complements the tiny Sony a5100 body perfectly. If you’re looking for a pocketable digital camera set up, pairing a compact mirrorless camera with a small lens is the best option.

I wrote an entire post on the best lenses for Sony a6000 owners, and any of the lenses mentioned there can be used equally well on the Sony a5100, so be sure to check it out.

A decent prime lens is the best investment you can make on an entry-level camera, bringing out the most of what it’s capable of.

When we reviewed the Sony a5100 in more depth, our reviewer chose to pair it with the excellent Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 lens – ‘FE’ lenses refer to ones made predominantly for the full frame sensor, but they also work with APS-C crop sensor cameras like the one on the a5100.

Pro Tip: Whether you think you’ll be upgrading to a full frame camera in the future or not, it’s a good idea to consider full frame lenses, even if you have a crop sensor body. Despite being larger, heavier and more expensive than lenses designed for APS-C bodies, full frame lenses usually offer better image quality and more robust build quality.

Having said that, the ‘kit’ lens that comes bundled with this a5100 performs surprisingly well – as you can see in the image below, you’re able to get that coveted blurred-background-look (‘bokeh’) really easily. (Another way is to blur the background using Lightroom.)


You can get some great bokeh out of the Sony a5100 + kit lens | © Matthew Murray

As is typical with Sony cameras, there’s a button for everything and a few that can even be customised to suit your needs.

On the Sony a5100, you can use the control wheel next to the screen to control exposure compensation, shooting modes, ISO and aperture – basically everything you need to take a well exposed photo, or get creative with under/over-exposing your subject.

Sharing photos is a lot of fun with the built in WiFi and NFC – if your smartphone supports it, simply install the Sony Play Memories App, then touch the camera to the phone for a connection, and your images to transfer, or to be able to control it remotely – amazing!

The Sony a5100 is aimed at anyone who wants a big step-up in quality and control over their smartphone but without the bulk of a DSLR.

Its size makes it a good travel camera, but remember to try and pair it with a small-ish lens to really take advantage of its proportions – see also Sony a5100 vs a5000.

Overall, this is a great mirrorless camera + zoom lens option, that’s more than worthy of your hard earned cash! It’s also arguably the best budget camera you can buy for travel.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with 14-42MM Lens

Olympus OM D E M10 Mark II

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 18
Sensor Size:
Micro Four Thirds
Dimensions: 4.6 x 3.2 x 1.8 in. (119 x 83 x 46 mm)
399g (14 oz.)

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II is what’s known as a ‘micro-four-thirds’ camera (MFT). This refers to the size of the sensor, being slightly smaller than an APS-C sensor.

The sensor size largely determines the size of the lens, and the MFT format was developed to offer great image quality without sacrificing portability. With the EM-10 Mark II, you’re getting a lot of the latest technology crammed into a compact body that still retains those pleasing DSLR-like ergonomics.

Also packed inside is the latest image processor, 5-axis image stabilization, 8.5 fps, a touch screen tilting LCD display, class-leading autofocus performance and a whole lot more.

(If you’re looking for something newer, check out our review of the OM-D E-M10 Mark III.)

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II is the only camera in this list with image stabilization – a feature normally found on much more expensive camera bodies, enabling you to handhold the camera in low light, allowing the use of slower shutter speeds and lower ISOs (for a cleaner image).

Despite it having the smallest image sensor out of all the cameras mentioned here, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II can definitely hold its own in terms of image quality. It’s also fantastic value for money, although you’ll see the price is actually slightly over $500 since a lens is included – purchasing the body alone is of course cheaper.

The tried and tested 16MP sensor is used across the board on Olympus mirrorless cameras, delivering very good JPEG and RAW image quality. 

Olympus OM D E M10 Mark II mirrorless camera

The dynamic range performance when editing a RAW file is impressive, providing a good degree of post processing latitude at low ISOs and no more noise than is expected at higher ISO settings.

Typically, the smaller the sensor size, the more limited the high ISO capabilities (i.e. the ability to shoot in low light without a flash).

Thankfully, Olympus MFT cameras perform competitively, being almost on par with APS-C cameras, meaning you’ll be able to forgo the flash for a good while after sunset.

If you really want to take advantage of low light shooting (and blurred backgrounds for subject separation), I highly recommend upgrading the kit lens to something like the Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8.

Expensive as it may be, this is the single biggest upgrade you can make for your Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II, bringing image quality in line with DSLRs costing twice the price.

(You can see examples of what’s possible in my review of the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, which has the same sensor as the E-M10 Mark II.)

The autofocus is incredibly responsive and accurate (even more so than DSLRs costing 3x the price, in fact). I absolutely love the ability to touch your subject on the rear LCD, to have the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III focus and shoot in a split-second.

Being able to shoot a subject without even raising the camera to your eye is perfect for capturing candid photos, and great for photographing children.

Face and eye detection in autofocus are also hugely rewarding for shooting portraits, and especially useful when you don’t have time to select an AF point manually.


Another thing I love about the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II, and the reason for my preference of it over the other best mirrorless cameras under $500 on this list, is its handsome styling and ergonomics.

Borrowing from the classic Olympus OM film cameras of old, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II features well-placed dials that mimic professional-level DSLRs. This means you can adjust all your exposure settings quickly and easily, without having to delve into the menu.

Speaking of the menu system, this is the only area that really lets the camera down. The Olympus mirrorless camera menu is notoriously deep and confusing, so once you have your camera set up, it’s preferable to stay clear of it!

If you’re looking for a lightweight, compact camera with ergonomics that make sure that it doesn’t feel like a bar of soap in your hands, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II should be at the top of your list. It offers a lot of camera for the money and will stand you in good stead in your development as a photographer.

Canon EOS M100 with 15-45MM Lens

Canon EOS M100

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 24.2
Sensor Size:
4.2 x 2.6 x 1.3 in. (108 x 67 x 35 mm)
Weight: 302g (10.6 oz.)

It’s taken a long time for Canon to release a mirrorless camera, but it finally happened in 2017 with the pocket-sized Canon EOS M100.

Whilst it wasn’t the DSLR-beating Canon mirrorless camera many were hoping for, the Canon EOS M100 represented a step in the right direction and has been a hugely popular camera for all levels of photographer.

The advanced technology of the 24MP APS-C sensor and Dual Pixel autofocus system is borrowed from cameras much higher up in the Canon camera range, meaning that the Canon EOS M100 is one of the best cameras for the dollar available this year.

The Dual Pixel autofocus delivers fast, accurate subject tracking, and coupled with the responsive, 180 degrees tilting touchscreen, this compact mirrorless camera really is a lot of fun to use.

Video shooters will appreciate the ability to ‘rack focus’, simply by dragging a finger across the touchscreen from one subject to another. This advanced feature isn’t normally seen on a compact camera, let alone a mirrorless camera costing less than $500.

Canon EOS M100 mirrorless camera under 500

As for image quality, Canon knows what it’s doing with colours, and the JPEGs out of the Canon EOS M100 look great.

With the selfie-friendly rotating screen, a skin smoothing/background blurring feature, interchangeable camera ‘jackets’, Creative Filters (e.g. grainy film, vintage, fish-eye, etc.) and Wifi for quick image to smartphone transfer, it’s clear that the Canon EOS M100 is aimed at the Instagram generation.

Weighing in at only 266g (9.4 oz.), the Canon EOS M100 is small and light enough to be carried anywhere, with its form factor being compromised only by the lens you choose to attach.

On the topic of lenses, the 15-45mm does a good job in a versatile focal range, but I’d recommend investing in the dinky Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens to really start seeing the capabilities of this little camera (not to mention making it more compact).

There’s already a solid range of EF-M lenses available for the M100, but where it gets especially interesting is if you invest in an M Mount Adapter to shoot with EF and EF-S lenses.


This opens up a world of creative options, and allows you to take advantage of any of the best Canon lenses – my first choice would be one of the lightweight primes.

However you plan to use your Canon EOS M100, you’re in for a lot of fun. With fun features that reflect the kind of user it’s aimed at, this compact Canon mirrorless camera offers some of the best image quality you can get in a camera of this size, and I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it.

Best Compact Cameras under $500

Compact cameras also fall under the heading of ‘mirrorless’ cameras, since they don’t rely on a mirror like a DSLR. However, I’ve chosen to keep this category for compact cameras under $500 with 1 inch sensors.

Typically, the smaller the sensor, the smaller the camera, and this is the case with these compacts, which can be slid into a jeans pocket and carried comfortably all day.

Smartphones and other compact cameras often have smaller sensors than 1 inch, and this usually means they struggle in low light.

However, the compact cameras recommended below produce great image quality even after sunset, and represent a solid upgrade from any smartphone or smaller sensor’d point and shoot camera, but we wouldn’t recommend them for professional photography applications.

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 20
Sensor Size:
1 inch
4.1 x 2.4 x 1.6 in. (105 x 61 x 42 mm)
11.2 oz (318 g)

The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II is currently available as a bundle, featuring some useful gadgets. It’s a little over our $500 budget, but it’s such an excellent bargain that I had to include it.

Building on an impressive 20.2MP 1″ sensor, the 24-100mm equivalent lens is the real stand out feature, offering an aperture range of f/1.8 – 2.8.

Having an aperture this ‘fast’ allows you to shoot without a flash in low light, without having to resort to higher ISOs which may bring about a noisy image. (Read this post on understanding aperture if you want to learn more about how fast apertures can help.)

The ISO performance on the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II is actually good for a sensor of this size, but shooting at lower ISOs is always favourable.

In practice, I was able to get relatively clear shots as high as ISO800, but that didn’t mean that I’d be limited myself to that number – my preference is to allow the camera to push ISOs = all the way up to ISO10,000, meaning that at least I could capture the moment.

Even at extremely high ISOs, the Canon G7X Mark II can produce a great looking image | 1/500 f/1.8 ISO10,000

Thanks to the surprising amount of data in the RAW files out of the Canon G7 X Mark II, it’s easy to clean up the noise from any image shot at high ISO, as you can see in the photo above.

The fast aperture range allows you to produce images with blurry backgrounds, helping to separate the foreground subject – your smartphone may be able to do it with AI, but it’s not as efficient as using a dedicated camera to do it.

As you zoom the lens (whether with the dedicated control slider or with the lens ring set to one of the two zoom functions), the aperture changes from f/1.8 at the lens’s widest point, to f/2.8.

For such a compact mirrorless camera, the Canon G7 X Mark II has excellent ergonomics, with a raised, rubberised grip on the front and the rear – something that its predecessor was lacking.

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II review

Packing a 24-100mm zoom into a camera that can easily slide into your pocket is no mean feat – the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II is one of the smallest in this roundup of compact digital cameras under $500, and provides a significant step up in image quality from your smartphone.

Physical knobs and buttons provide quick access to all the manual exposure settings, or you can leave the camera on Auto to get an accurate exposure in most situations.

A new processor allows for better face detection and provides snappier shooting and operation speeds than the previous model. 8fps (both JPEG and RAW) and accurate AF will make sure even fast-moving subjects can be captured with ease.

Whilst it lacks a viewfinder, the tilting LCD touchscreen on the G7 X Mark II is responsive and fast, and the menu easy to navigate. I love being able to tap menu items to select them, as well as being able to tap to focus and shoot.

Shooting in this way in conjunction with the tilting LCD screen, with the camera held at hip level allows for discrete photography and totally candid subjects.


As a unique feature to the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II, ‘Dual Sensing IS’ helps to reduce blur caused by camera shake. This is especially helpful when shooting at the 100mm end of the zoom, where even small camera movements can cause blur on other cameras.

The only small area of concern is battery life, which at around 265 shots per charge, lags a little behind its competitors – if you’re traveling or shooting a lot in a day, invest in some spare batteries.

If you’re lucky enough to find the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II for around $500, snap it up – despite the lack of an International warranty at this sale price, it’s a reliable, solidly built camera that won’t let you down.

Sony RX100

Sony RX100 mirrorless camera under 500

See More Reviews

Megapixels: 20
Sensor Size:
1 inch
0.8 x 1.4 x 3 in. (22 x 36 x 77.5 mm)
240 g (8.46 oz.)

Yes… I’m writing this roundup of the best cameras under $500 in 2022, and yes this Sony RX100 was released in 2012 – get over it! Cameras don’t need to be the very latest to be great at what they do! (If you absolutely need the latest model, check our review of the RX100 VI and RX100 VII.)

If you’ve only got 500 bucks to spend, ignore the more recent versions of this camera and stick with the one that rewrote the rule book for what is capable with a compact camera.

The Sony RX100was the first camera to put a 1″ sensor into a camera you can slip into your back pocket. Whilst a 1″ sensor is smaller than an MFT and APS-C sensor, it still offers imaging performance that’s unrivalled among other compact cameras.

Check the latest price of the Sony RX100, as last time I checked, it was the cheapest 1″ sensor compact camera on the market. This makes it a great option if you’ve only got $500 to spend, but still want a camera with you at all times (that’s much better than your smartphone).

I don’t care if you have the latest iPhone or Pixel smartphones – the Sony RX100 will wipe the floor with them!

Sony RX100 mirrorless camera under 500 1

The 20.2MP sensor coupled with the 28-100mm f/1.8-4.9 zoom lens (3.6x zoom) is all you’ll ever need for most situations.

Shooting at an aperture of f/1.8 means that you can capture candid shots in low light without having to resort to flash, and if you’re close enough to your subject, you can get that coveted blurred background look too.

The Sony RX100 is a great camera for beginners with a simple, effective AUTO mode, but it also offers full manual controls for those who wish to learn. I highly recommend you take your camera off the automatic modes as soon as possible, so you can learn how to be more creative with your exposure settings.

Face recognition and 10 fps (!) will ensure you don’t miss your shot, and typical of Sony, the movie functionality is second to none at this price point.


JPEG and RAW image quality are great and much better than you’d typically expect from a pocketable camera of this size.

The lack of dynamic range is consistent with its 1″ sensor size, but the Sony RX100 does a good job at nailing exposure and white balance, so there’s not much need for post production.

You could shoot this camera in JPEG all day, and never have to worry about sitting in front of the computer editing the photos – the image quality is that good.

If you need the smallest possible camera with decent image quality, the Sony RX100 is a good bet. Although it’s getting a little long in the tooth compared to the more modern mirrorless cameras in this list, it’s still a camera with some amazing features and one you can keep comfortably in your back pocket all day long.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best camera for under 500 dollars?
That depends a little on your preferences. For under $500 you can find a reasonably good dSLR, mirrorless camera or compact camera. If we’re to weigh up all the options, though, our top pick is the Sony a5100 as it’s small and light and gives you the best bang for your buck.

What camera has the best image quality?
If you’re looking purely at image quality in the sub-500 dollar range, the Sony a5100 is still a great option as it produces vibrant, punchy and crisp images. For something a little heftier, we like the Nikon D3400. As a DSLR option, it offers excellent image quality – even if you stick with the kit lens.

Which type of camera is best?
Each type has its advantages. For example, DSLRs are often more reliable, more ergonomic, and have longer battery life. Compact cameras are exactly that – compact. Mirrorless are really the latest technology though, and you can expect them to be taking over more and more. So if you’re looking for something lightweight yet powerful and with plenty of future opportunities for add-ons and upgrades, mirrorless may be the way to go.

What is a good cheap camera for beginners?
The Nikon D3400 falls into the sub-$500 price bracket and comes with a highly useful “beginner mode” that guides you through various situations. The Sony RX100 is another top pick for beginners on a budget, as it has a great Auto mode that you can start out on before learning all the manual settings.

Final Words

I hope this guide has helped you in your quest for a great camera that doesn’t break the bank.

While a budget of around $500 may not have been enough to get a decent camera a few years back, thanks to advances in technology and the drop in relative material prices, it’s now possible for photographers to pick up amazing products while still remaining on a tight budget.

(See also: best point and shoot camera under $300)

Once you have one of the camera bodies on this list, you can either stick with the included kit lens, or invest a little more on something with a larger aperture (a ‘faster’ lens). This will be the single most effective way in getting every last detail out of your camera.

Faster lenses also allow you to shoot at lower ISOs, which can mean much ‘cleaner’ images in low light, where typically cameras of this price point struggle.

Whatever the case, as long as you have a camera with a lens attached to the front, you’re good to go! Now get out and start shooting ;-)

Sony a5100

Incredible autofocus, image quality & video in a compact body. Best bang for the buck in 2019.

Check Current Price

Disclaimer: All recommendations are impartial and based on user experience, with no bias to the products or the brand. The products in this post may contain affiliate links.

Mark Condon

Mark Condon is a British wedding photographer based in Australia and the founder of Shotkit.


  1. Jaya on December 30, 2021 at 4:18 am

    Canon EOS Rebel T6 is best for making professional youtube videos and everything. Thank you, This is just an amazing article for whom, who wants to buy a DSLR under $500.

  2. shahid ali on July 2, 2021 at 3:19 pm

    cameras you mentioned are great. I’d be tempted to go for the D3300 personally

  3. Micheal Pfeffer  on April 6, 2021 at 1:18 am

    Hello Mark,
    I’m a vlogger. So I think This is really so helpful article for all kind of vloggers.
    Thanks for share your experience.

  4. José Antonio on September 5, 2020 at 8:26 am

    Hello Mark

    Thank you very much, I was fascinated by your article. I think few sites provide that much quality video content. I keep the D3400 and I would like to know if it is possible, if the photos of the articles are yours.

    Thanks Mark

    • Mark Condon on September 6, 2020 at 10:54 am

      Thanks José, yes those are my photos.

  5. Andrei Weddings on July 29, 2020 at 3:27 pm

    Thank you very much for sharing these ideas… I really appreciate your efforts in creating this exceptionally good content. I was looking for such content about best camera under have really helped me with the same… great post!!

  6. Michael Rivera on January 2, 2020 at 5:37 am

    If you have a smartphone with a decent camera, that’s already quite a bit better than a lot of “serious” cameras out there. Unless you go over $500 I highly doubt you can get a camera with recording capability/user-friendliness that significantly exceeds that of a modern smartphone camera.

    Of course, we are also leaving lenses out of the equation, which is a whole different can of work for another time ;)

    • Mark Condon on January 5, 2020 at 9:30 pm

      Yep lenses, better ISO, ergonomics, dedicated viewfinders, frame rates, dynamic range, and whole host of other factors, Michael.

  7. Bethzy Elonia on June 21, 2019 at 4:41 pm

    Very Informative list, all camera at one place, In India Nikon D5600 is on the top under 500$

  8. Steve Brodsky on June 21, 2019 at 6:30 am

    Thank You for the great article. My choice would be the Canon G7X II.


    • Mark Condon on June 22, 2019 at 6:35 pm

      Glad you found it useful, Steve. Yep the G7X II is a great value camera!

  9. Bethzy Elonia on May 27, 2018 at 1:29 pm

    Hi Mark! love your reviews!
    I used to be a Nikon fan, but something about Canon and Sony that made me rather unfaithful. 0_0 Nikon truly is easy to use, and with an illustration displayed on the screen, it makes understanding shutter speed, aperture and ISO easier to understand. Now, Canon became a bit of a challenge for me. Simply because I got used to the displays of Nikon cameras. Nevertheless, once I got the hang of it, I noticed how versatile it was and the end result, I just love the images and videos I get from the Canon camera. My experience with a Sony mirrorless camera is just as exciting as well. Love the weight and the low light scenes are still clear!

    • Mark on May 28, 2018 at 2:14 pm

      Aw thanks Bethzy! Yep, I agree – when you change brands it can be a little confusing initially with the different layouts. Glad to hear you’re liking the mirrorless format! All the best ;-)

  10. RC on May 3, 2018 at 5:37 am

    Suggestions for something in this price range that would take good action shots. I want pictures of my kids playing sports. Thanks!

    • Mark on May 3, 2018 at 7:32 am

      Any of these cameras can keep up with kids, but the one with the fastest frame rate would be the Sony a5100

  11. Lorraine on December 22, 2017 at 10:28 am

    I have been interested in taking photography seriously and have been ready to pull the trigger for my 2018 goal! A camera is a big purchase and I make sure to do my research before jumping into anything. After the many articles I have read (and God only know how many there have been) – this, by far, has been the most helpful. I look forward to binge read all of the other blogs you have posted. :P

    • Mark on December 23, 2017 at 5:28 am

      Have fun with the binge Lorraine and thanks for the kind comment!

  12. Ijaz Ahmad on November 18, 2017 at 10:55 am

    Simply awsome post Mark. Just wanted to say I have not found this kind of summarized information on Cameras anywhere else. Thanks for writing this and thinking of novice users like me :)

    • Mark on November 19, 2017 at 6:40 am

      Thanks Ijaz! I’m going to be writing some more posts on the more budget-friendly cameras and accessories soon.

  13. Beren on September 14, 2017 at 7:10 pm

    Hi Mark. Thanks for the great review. I’m buying something to take pictures of my kids and I want to take it with me when we go out. Some people tell me to buy DSLR, but I always say the same thing as you wrote in your review – I’m not going to carry it around together with my kids. I would buy the RX-100, but it is still a bit too expensive for me. What would you recomend from: Sony WX350, Sony HX60 and Canon SX710 HS? Thank you so much.

    • Mark on September 15, 2017 at 4:51 am

      Hey Beren, I think that’s wise of you! All those cameras are great, so I’d make the decision based on how each feels in your hands. Take special note of the button placement, weight and shape of the camera to make your final decision. Hope that helps!

  14. Miriam on August 24, 2017 at 10:15 pm

    Hey there, many thanks for this post. I have to admit your website is one of the best ones I have seen about camera gear. Nowadays many of them are full of adds and you offer great content without showing hundreds of popus. Just wanted to let you know how grateful I am for offering great information whitouht disturbing the user. Keep up your nice work!

    • Mark on August 25, 2017 at 6:27 pm

      Aw, thanks so much for saying that Miriam! It means a lot to me :-)

  15. Elizabeth A Littler on August 22, 2017 at 11:24 am

    This is my only comment…..I left my Powershot A620 in the box for one year, afraid I wouldn’t understand how to operate it. Then. I started using it and loved it. After while I noticed that the LCD was rather small and didn’t function well in bright sun but mostly it was OK and took great pictures. I take many pictures of wildflower, moths, butterflies and other insects. Then, One day the lens didn’t pop open and that was the end.
    I was advised that no one would repair it for me and if they did, it would cost almost as much as a new one. (No true by the way as I have been pricing cameras and I think a comaera as go as my would cost a lot more.)
    So, I’m looking for a new one and figured I would have to spend about $500 for the same quality as my canon. Your column was very interesting even though several of the cameras you listed have jumped in price ( more than $200 in some cases) and unfortunately the ones that took my interest.
    So, what would be the camera closest to my former, now deceased, Powershot?

    • Mark on August 22, 2017 at 7:35 pm

      It’s a tough one, Elizabeth. If you like the Powershot series, I’d stick to them and just find the one that suits your budget.

  16. Parth Vinodbhai rathod on July 22, 2017 at 5:30 am

    “Canon Rebel T3i” is best from my POV. Very good article though
    thank you

  17. Yoldalyn on July 18, 2017 at 5:40 am

    Hey great article. This helped out a lot. Which of these would you recommend if im mostly just recording? I was thinking the D3300. Would like a second opinion if possible. Thanks in advnce.

    • Mark on July 19, 2017 at 12:25 am

      These recommendations are from a stills perspective. The D3300 would handle movie recording just fine though.

  18. Josh on July 17, 2017 at 2:45 am

    Hi, is Ricoh GR II worth the money or is it just the hype? I want a camera which gives excellent sharp images in BW

    • Mark on July 19, 2017 at 12:34 am

      It’s a great camera if you’re a fan of a slightly wider field of view that’s fixed. I’ll be reviewing it soon.

  19. Parth Vinodbhai rathod on June 17, 2017 at 2:03 am

    hey Mark !
    i am a photography student and i am confused between canon rebel T3i and Nikon D3200 which one will give me better results
    thank you

    • Mark on June 18, 2017 at 8:39 pm

      Very similar end results from those two cameras Parth.

  20. Diane on May 23, 2017 at 9:44 pm

    Great site with loads of information!

  21. Lothar on May 14, 2017 at 12:38 am

    What about samsung nx500? ? Its reall great camera (photo quality&4k recording&small size&good iso&finally price is so good as well. …so….??

  22. Alaina Wilson on February 26, 2017 at 5:33 am

    Olympus Tough TG- 4 Worked nicely with me. Awesome camera at low price. Thanks for this guide!

    • Mark on February 26, 2017 at 5:45 am

      Ah good to know! Thanks Alaina

  23. Lucy on February 25, 2017 at 7:12 pm

    Hi Mark,
    Great and informative website! I am in the market for a new point-shoot camera. I have been using Sony cameras over the years, and the last one was DSC-H70. I am trying to decide between DSC-RX100 and DSC-HX90. Which are your thoughts and the pros and cons between those two?
    Thanks, Lucy

    • Mark on February 26, 2017 at 5:47 am

      Hey Lucy! Thanks for the kind words. Both those cameras are decent! It’s a bit hard to give you a full answer in a comment, but feel free to email me ;-)

  24. Daniel S on February 21, 2017 at 11:42 am

    I agree about the Nikon D3300 being a great option. Nikon now offers the D3400 as an upgrade to the D3300 as well.

  25. John Dunn on February 21, 2017 at 4:56 am

    Hi great post. I owned the Olympus Tough TG-4 for a while but, as you mentioned, found the image quality poor. There were also problems of focus with any debris in the water.


    • Mark on February 21, 2017 at 5:19 am

      Thanks for the feedback, John. I think that making a camera of this price waterproof does have certain drawbacks to what the lens can achieve.

  26. Shaun - Wedding Videography on January 20, 2017 at 4:49 am

    Ive only just found your website and want to say thank you so much. Some great advice on here and so much to read and get through.

    • Mark on January 20, 2017 at 6:45 am

      Glad you like it, Shaun!

  27. Martin on January 12, 2017 at 2:03 pm

    Hi Mark,

    First of all, great website and very useful information, including for novices such as myself. Quick question though, I’m assuming the dollar amounts in which you write are US$ right? I just had a look for the Sony DSC-RX100 and its RRP in AUD is $649.

    • Mark on January 13, 2017 at 10:02 am

      Hey Martin, yes that’s right. For those of us in Australia, we’ll always be jealous of those US prices!

  28. sam tziotzios on December 18, 2016 at 2:54 am

    the canon t2i was the predecessor to the t3i and is still a great camera that i now have as a backup (still works). you can find these used very cheap.

  29. Krista on October 2, 2016 at 6:33 am

    Hi Mark,
    I’m looking for a camera that will take high quality photos for personal and professional use but on a budget. I don’t want to spend more than $400, but I don’t want to sacrifice quality so I would consider spending more.
    I know NOTHING about cameras, but I have used ” fancy” ones before and it wasn’t super hard, but I might have been doing it wrong haha

    I want to be able to take photos of action (fitness) shots and indoor shots in places with not the best lighting. I would be traveling with it so size is a factor. I will be using these for web banners, Facebook, etc. being able to upload them quickly is a huge plus.

    Please help!!! What do you recommend

    • Mark on October 3, 2016 at 7:15 pm

      It’s hard to recommend something Krista since there are so many variables, but I’d recommend saving up an extra $100 and choosing any of the ones in this post based on size and how they feel in your hand. Hope that helps!

  30. Ashley on September 26, 2016 at 11:35 pm

    Hi Mark,
    I read your article, and it’s really great, and very helpful.
    I can’t decide what camera to buy… I travel a lot, so I need it mostly for traveling, holydays, and indoor photos. I had Superzoom Panasonic Lumix FZ45, but I wasn’t really satisfied with that camera.
    Now, after reading this article, I think maybe Mirrorless or Point and Shoot. At first, I wanted DSLR, but after some reading, I don’t think that is a best choice for me.
    What would be your recomendation for camera from 200$- 400$? Many Thanks!

    • Mark on September 29, 2016 at 4:22 pm

      Hey Ashley! It’s a bit hard to recommend here, but I’ll be putting together another post like this for cameras in that price range soon! Stay tuned :-)

  31. Cal on August 24, 2016 at 2:43 am

    Hi Mark,

    I was considering getting my first DSLR as I want to get into photography, but decided they are just too big and bulky for my use case. I’m moving from the UK to China – so probably lots of street/travel photography.

    Good video would be really nice, but its probably not a priority.

    I’m considering:

    – Fujifilm X-T10
    – Canon GX7

    But the higher quality fixed lens options are quite appealing for a budget tight traveler such as myself:

    – The Panasonic LX100 is probably my first choice (although apparently a new model is coming out soon)
    – Sony RX100 (mark i, ii, or iii)

    Budget is a bit lower than this article (£200- £400), but I’m likely to buy a second hand ebay bargain.

    Which model would you recommend? Many Thanks!

    • Mark on August 24, 2016 at 7:00 am

      Hey Cal. You’ve short-listed some great cameras there. I’ve owned the X-T10, and used all the others you mention too, and can say first hand that they’re all capable of producing a great image. I think that if you’re looking for street/travel camera, the main factor should be size. The cameras with interchangeable lenses offer great flexibility, but size-wise, you can’t beat a fixed lens. Maybe wait for the new model Panasonic to be released, then if you don’t need the new functions (I doubt they’ll change the sensor), buy the current model on sale. Good luck!

  32. Becky on August 3, 2016 at 12:43 am

    I must thank you profusely for this. My Canon SX50 suddenly, and hugely disappointingly, developed the Black Screen of Death after only 2 1/2 years, stuck shutter, requiring me to purchase yet another camera when I wasn’t expecting to. Your upbeat, thorough, and enthusiastic writing calmed my freaked-out-ness and your perfect amount of “dumbing down” was, well, perfect for me. Just wanted to let you know how much I appreciated your help. To let you know too, as time and the internet does, some of these are hard to find and prices have changed but obviously it’s impossible to keep up. I ended up purchasing the Fuji X-A1 based on your recommendations and I look forward to years of happy snapping. I will definitely be sharing your post on my blog as well at some point soon. Thank you!!

    • Mark on August 3, 2016 at 4:28 am

      Hi Becky! Wow, I’m so glad the post helped you! The Fuji X-A1 is a great camera so I’m confident it’ll serve you well for a long time. Good luck with your photography :-) Cheers, Mark

  33. Callum on July 24, 2016 at 9:51 pm

    What are your thoughts on the Panasonic G7. I’m interested in the 4k video. I’ll be needing a camera for family use and a bit of amateur film-making. Thanks.

    • Mark on July 25, 2016 at 2:13 pm

      It’s an excellent camera Callum – good for stills and movies.

  34. Jan on July 22, 2016 at 6:58 am

    What about Nikon 1 J5. Is it good enought to match x-a1 or e-pl6 for example?

    • Mark on July 22, 2016 at 1:32 pm

      It’s good but the x-a1 is slightly better imo Jen

  35. Tom on May 18, 2016 at 5:46 pm

    12 months ago I ditched super heavy full frame gear and switched to 1 body and 1 lens…..FujiXE2 and Samyang 12mm……….best move ever!

    • Mark on May 19, 2016 at 5:16 am

      That’s great Tom! Bet your back/neck is thanking you :-)

  36. steve on March 18, 2016 at 4:53 pm

    I already own a Nikon 3100 I am considering buying a sony hx400 I like its zoom capability and its just under 500. Whats your take

    • Mark on March 19, 2016 at 6:17 am

      Can’t compete with the 50x zoom! Also I like the flip out screen on the Sony.

      • Kharrahou on June 15, 2017 at 3:46 am

        You should not overlook the fact that the Sony superzoom has only the sensor size of a basic point-and-shoot. But its fixed Carl Zeiss lens is hard to beat.

  37. Kp on January 9, 2016 at 1:25 am

    What would you recommended for a fitness channel? I will be vlogging, filming workouts and taking fitness model type pictures. Help!

    • Mark on January 9, 2016 at 9:09 am

      For filming workouts it sounds like you may need a camera with good video auto focus capabilities – I’d recommend investing a little more and considering this one:

  38. Mak on December 29, 2015 at 3:14 am

    Dear Mark, Awesome review, really helpful. But I have a problem, my budget is exactly $400. I need a camera for portraits, landscapes, holidays but not for videos. I want the camera to have really awesome quality pictures and more megapixels (like 24). So I am Really confused between Nikon D3200 and D3300. Please suggest me the best or any other DSLR That you think can fulfil my requirements more effeciently. :)

    • Mark on December 30, 2015 at 5:43 am

      Hi Mak. Thanks for the comment. I’d recommend either of those two Nikons – they’re both excellent entry level dSLRs. Just remember that your budget will have to extend to a lens too – I’d recommend a Nikon 50mm 1.8 as an affordable starter prime lens. Good luck!

  39. KB on December 17, 2015 at 5:14 am

    Hi Mark- any advice on which one of these are best for low-light shots? and the best for action shots? more specifically shooing concerts / equestrian show jumping. Would love to know!

    • Mark on December 17, 2015 at 6:35 pm

      That’s a tough question KB but I’d say go for either the Nikon or the Canon dSLR. Both will handle higher ISOs better than the other cameras which have smaller sensors. Then you’d need to invest in a fast lens (a good affordable option is a 50mm f/1.8) to help you with low light shots. As for the action element, whilst neither of these dSLRs have blazing fast frame rates, they’re both more than adequate for most things, and the continuous auto focus should be better than a mirrorless camera too. I hope that helps!

  40. leila on October 22, 2015 at 3:58 am

    hello. thanks for your post. I want to buy a camera under 500$ but I want to take film with camera. please tell me best choice .

    • Mark on October 22, 2015 at 5:51 am

      For film cameras Leila, I’d really recommend you go to your local second hand camera store and have a play around with whatever they have. It’s hard to recommend a film camera since it boils down a lot to user preference and what is available at the time. Good luck!

  41. Bobbi on October 21, 2015 at 5:52 pm

    My Nikon D5200 has gone way down in price. I have seen it under $500.00!

  42. Amy on October 5, 2015 at 12:29 pm

    I own the Canon G16 and you actually CAN swap lenses with this camera by using a conversion lens adaptor. See

    • Mark on October 6, 2015 at 6:14 am

      Ah interesting! Thanks for letting us know Amy!

  43. Fitra on October 1, 2015 at 5:10 pm

    Hi Mark, thanks for your post. It’s really helpful. I want to buy a mirrorless camera for traveling. What do you think about Samsung NX300? I like their retro style and tilting LCD. Or do you have any other recommendation?

  44. Ashley on September 22, 2015 at 3:43 am

    Hi Mark! I’m looking for a nice camera to give as a gift.. I’m leaning towards the point and shoots. Would it be worth it to spend an extra $100-$150 to get a Leica C or D-LUX 6 on sale?

    • Mark on September 22, 2015 at 4:54 am

      Hey Ashley! If you can find a good price on one of those cameras, they would make a really nice gift! I’d love to receive something with the word Leica on it ;-)

  45. Deirdre on June 2, 2015 at 12:42 am

    I have the Canon S100 and I really like it. It has some things I would change, but as far as not carrying around my Canon pro gear, it does the trick! The only thing is that you need extra batteries and it’s only fast at 24mm. It shoots raw and video is pretty decent.

    • Mark on June 2, 2015 at 5:00 am

      Ah interesting feedback Deidre. It’s literally a weight off your shoulders not having to carry around pro gear :-)

  46. Bramulya on May 20, 2015 at 8:39 pm

    hey mark, nice post of you, i like to buy a dslr camera because i want to capture the moment at my house and especially my mom, i’m thinking d3200 or d3300 as my option, but i’m considering more about sony, like sony alpha a3500, imho because i think that sony got better sensor than the others, because evey smartphone now use sony camera, what do you think and suggest? thanks mate!

    • Mark on May 20, 2015 at 9:19 pm

      Hi Bramulya! All those cameras you mentioned are great. I’d be tempted to go for the D3300 personally though, just because I’m a Nikon shooter! Good luck :-)

  47. Andy on May 19, 2015 at 9:37 pm

    What about the E-M10? I have an entry level DSLR and was looking for something smaller for street photography, without breaking the bank.

    • Mark on May 20, 2015 at 8:03 pm

      Yep the Olympus OMD range are awesome cameras too Andy. My choice would be the EM-5 but the 10 is also excellent.

      • Andy on May 22, 2015 at 12:04 am

        Yeah, just trying to cut cost down. The E-M5 m2 would be my first choice but it’s a lot more than the 10, where I am anyway.

  48. Felipe on May 15, 2015 at 3:01 am

    Nice post and very helpful. I’m buying a DSLR and the nikon d3200 seems to be the one, do you have any suggestions for night timelapses? is it the t3i better?
    I live in a region wich has one of the clearest skies in the country (Chile) with stuning landscapes.

    • Mark on May 15, 2015 at 6:57 am

      Hi Felipe. For a night timelapse, any of these cameras with this functionality combined with a sturdy tripod and perhaps a remote shutter release would be perfect. I look forward to seeing your pictures!

  49. ryo on May 8, 2015 at 12:39 pm

    hi mark, i don’t think nikon D3200 has flip out screen…you dumbed it down too far =)
    nice article btw, very helpful!

    • Mark on May 9, 2015 at 6:06 am

      Good spot Ryo! I’ll correct that now!

  50. IZZ on April 29, 2015 at 11:02 am

    Great post. Very informative. I think you’re right about the huskiness of DSLR cameras. I really want a DSLR but I just can’t see myself taking it to dinner and whipping it out. Another thing is even when I’m out on vacation in gonna have to use a tripod to get a picture with me in it. I just can’t see myself asking a stranger to take the pic. So that leaves mirror less or point and shoot…

    • Mark on April 29, 2015 at 8:50 pm

      Yeah size is a big concern for sure! The quality of the pics from mirrorless and point and shoots has come along so much recently that I don’t think you can go wrong with any of the camera recommended here. Thanks for the comment!

Leave a Comment



Enter your email to be sent
today's Welcome Gift:
19 Photography Tools