Luminar vs Affinity comparison

Luminar vs Affinity for Photo Editing: Key Differences

Luminar vs Affinity: Read a feature-by-feature comparison of Luminar and Affinity and choose the image editor which is best for you.

Luminar | Software | By Kavita Verma | Last Updated: September 14, 2023

Whether you shoot to collect memories or you’re a professional photographer, you need software to organize and edit your photos.

The big question all photographers in 2023 face is: Which software should you use?

Luminar vs Affinity comparison

Affordable image editor with powerful features & regular updates. Great for all levels of photographer.

Check Current Price

While it’s true that Adobe still dominates the photo editing market, many other tools have burst onto the scene as Lightroom alternatives for those who want to avoid subscription fees.

Two of the most popular are Skylum Luminar 4 and Affinity Photo – similar in some ways, but very different in others.

Wondering which image editor is better for you? Here we tackle the question of Luminar vs Affinity, so read our comprehensive review to get the answer.

Luminar Neo vs Affinity Photo in 2023

1. RAW Image Development

luminar vs affinity raw development

See More Reviews

The main difference between Luminar and Affinity Photo when it comes to RAW image development is the workflow.

Affinity Photo has different areas called “personas”: pre-processing is done in the Develop Persona, while detailed photo editing happens in the Photo Persona.

The thing about this is that you really need to commit to your RAW adjustments first in the Develop Persona before you can move across to the Photo Persona and make use of its more powerful tools for advanced editing.

This two-step process sets Affinity at a bit of a disadvantage because it means that you can’t easily change your initial adjustments once you’ve moved from one Persona to the next. Additionally, batch processing is limited to one Persona at a time.

Luminar, meanwhile, allows for non-destructive image editing in a single workflow. Any adjustments can be tightly and selectively applied to parts of an image using masks, and it tends to allow for very accurate edits.

As mentioned above, it wouldn’t be unfair to think of Luminar as being more like Lightroom and Affinity Photo as being more like Photoshop when it comes to image development.

In picking a winner here, we’re going with Luminar because the workflow is more streamlined, plus you can easily sync adjustments made in one image with any other photos in the image library – a great time-saver, especially for professional photographers (see our Luminar tutorial to see how simple it is to get started.)

That said, if you can get around the workflow issues, Affinity Photo is certainly very powerful for detailed, slick photo edits. It’s just a matter of pre-developing in the Develop Persona first and then making your more complex adjustments on top of that.

WINNER: Luminar

2. Workspace

Luminar 3 interface

Luminar’s interface is stylish and intuitive.

Both Luminar and Affinity Photo have a similar general layout and design aesthetic. The image you’re working on sits in the center and control panels run on the side or top of the workspace.

As we touched on previously, Affinity Photo divides its primary functions into sections called Personas. These make the workspace less cluttered by refining your focus to one task at a time. The Personas are:

  • Photo Persona (for retouching & editing)
  • Develop Persona (for RAW photo development)
  • Liquify Persona (liquify tool)
  • Export Persona (for saving your images)
  • Tone Mapping Persona (HDR merging)

Because the system of Personas is unique to Affinity it can be confusing at first. Once you get the hang of it though, Affinity is pretty straightforward and easy to use. See our Affinity Photo review to learn more.

The photo interface of Affinity Photo is also highly customizable so you can change it to fit your needs – this is similar to Affinity Designer, the software for graphic designers who want something like Adobe Illustrator but without the monthly fees.

Luminar, meanwhile, is known for its simplicity and a clear user interface. Like Affinity, it has a configurable interface and allows you to choose which adjustments you’d like to have displayed in the control panel.

Luminar’s Edit and Library functions are separate, and an information section displays metadata about exposure settings.

Considering that both applications have slick, customizable, easy-to-use interfaces (despite an initial learning curve), we can’t pick a clear winner here. We’re giving them a tie.


3. Performance

luminar vs affinity performance

Affinity Photo, despite some issues, wins out on performance.

Unfortunately, neither Affinity Photo or Luminar is flawless when it comes to performance.

Both programs could stand some improvements with regards to processing power, stability and speed – though there’s always going to be some compromise between powerful features and performance.

Luminar needs a little more work than Affinity in this regard. It lags from time to time, and the Windows version in particular seems to suffer from episodes of non-responsiveness.

Affinity sails along happily when you’re editing smaller file types (like JPEG) but struggles to cope with larger RAW files.

On the whole, though, editing in Affinity Photo is quite responsive and the app seems more stable overall.

One saving grace for Luminar 4 is that updates are plentiful, and Skylum addresses performance issues continuously.

WINNER: Affinity Photo… for now!

4. Value for Money

Luminar coupon code instructions for claiming discount

Try entering Luminar coupon code SHOTKIT15 at checkout to save $15.

Both Luminar 4 and Affinity are available as a one-time investment for Windows and Mac OS. Affinity Photo charges a one-off fee of US$49.99.

Users can install it on up to two computers for commercial purposes, or five PCs for non-commercial purposes.

Luminar’s fee differs each year  – click here to see how much it costs today, but in general, it’s around $70. Once paid, users can install it on up to five different computers.

One major difference between the two pricing plans is that Affinity has to be purchased separately for each OS, while Luminar’s multiple licenses can be used across different operating systems.

Though Luminar is pricier than Affinity, it’s stil competitive as a one-time purchase price, and Skylum publishes a whole roadmap of free updates which will become available over the coming months.

These updates usually bring with them useful new features (as well as bug fixes and under-the-hood improvements) – we feel that the asking price is justified when you see just how much value you receive after purchase.

In addition, you can save $15 by using the code SHOTKIT15 at checkout – click here, then look out for the text ‘Enter Promotional Code’ (see above screenshot).

WINNER: Luminar

5. Local Editing Tools

luminar vs affinity local editing

Luminar 4 allows for precise local editing using filters and masks.

Both Affinity and Luminar use adjustment layers with editable masks. Both offer cloning, healing and stamping, but Luminar’s cloning implementation process is fairly basic.

Where Luminar’s local editing capabilities shine are with its pre-designed filters. Rather than having to apply every little adjustment individually, you can choose to apply one of the dozens of filters then use the corresponding sliders to tweak how it looks.

You can combine different filters or layer them over each other, and use masks to select where in the image you want the filters to be applied.

Thanks to its filter system, Luminar allows for a vast realm of editing potential.

When it comes to local editing with Affinity Photo, you’ve got access to advanced tools for image selection, cloning, and masking in the Photo Persona. Because you’ve already done your RAW image processing in the Develop Persona it’s important to make your local adjustments in layers so as to keep the editing non-destructive.

For some reason, Affinity Photo puts its liquify tool in a separate persona, so you’ll need to switch across to that to do any liquify edits.

The liquify tool works well overall, but processing here is notably slower and you’ll probably get some lag.

While you can make detailed and accurate local edits with both Luminar and Affinity, we’re giving this one to Luminar because its library of pre-designed filters makes editing both powerful and easy and gives you a lot to work with out of the box.

WINNER: Luminar

6. Extra Features

affinity photo panorama stitching

Affinity photo has extra features like seamless photo stitching.

Affinity Photo offers a long list of extra features like HDR merging, panorama stitching, focus stacking, frequency separation, typography, and much more.

Affinity also has an Assistant feature which, when clicked on, lets you create presets for specific tools.

The most obvious downside to Affinity is the lack of any photo organization system. You can’t use it to catalogue your images, nor does it integrate with social media or email for seamless uploading.

While Affinity Photo is great for creating professional images in a Photoshop-like way, it’s just not an all-round photo editing and management tool.

On the other hand, Luminar 4 is a full-featured photo editor with more than 300 robust tools and features, including fast RAW support, custom brushes for selective editing, watermarking, and dozens of customizable photo filters, to name a few.

Intelligent filters like Accent AI 2.0 allow you to take your photo from average to impressive in mere seconds.

The Sky Replacement tool is particularly impressive, allowing you to realistically replace the sky in your image in seconds.

Luminar also offers library management options. In this section, you can search for images, assign star ratings, add color labels to images, and flag images as selected or rejected.

You can sort the image library by multiple options, though you can’t use custom tags or metadata (an issue Skylum promises to resolve soon with a free update).

While Luminar is still a long way off Adobe Lightroom with regards to DAM features and general organisation of files, it’s definitely a lot better than Affinity in this regard. (See Lightroom vs Luminar 4 for a more in-depth feature comparison.)

WINNER: Luminar

Overall Winner: Luminar Neo

Luminar Accent AI 2.0

Luminar’s Accent AI 2.0 lets you selectively adjust elements like skies just by dragging a slider.

When it comes to the crunch, we’d pick Luminar as the better out of the two image editing software.

Affinity Photo might win on the sheer number of features and image editing tools, but Luminar‘s tools are simpler to use and come with a huge amount of customization.

Luminar’s library module is another added advantage because it lets you edit your photos and manage your image collection all in one place.

And finally, Luminar wins out because Skylum is dedicated to constant updates and improvements – something which isn’t quite as clear with Serif and their Affinity Photo product.

Here are a few of the updates with the release of Luminar 4:

  • NEW: Edit Module
    A completely redesigned experience that improves the discoverability of tools and simplifies the editing process
  • NEW: AI Sky Replacement
    Using Skylum’s machine learning technology, Luminar 4 is the first photo editor to offer fully automated sky replacement technology
  • NEW: AI Skin Enhancer
    Automatically remove skin imperfections like acne, freckles, and moles in addition to smoothing skin
  • NEW: Smart Contrast
    Easily improve contrast where needed without destroying key details
  • NEW: AI Structure
    Boosts details where needed without damaging the rest of the photo — without selections, layers, or masks
  • NEW: Color Styles Library (LUT Mapping) Quickly change the color and mood of your photos with cinematic color styles
  • NEW: Luminar Looks (presets)
    Unlock creative options and quickly solve problems with adaptive presets
  • IMPROVED: Stability and performance • IMPROVED: Golden Hour filter
  • IMPROVED: Denoise filter
  • IMPROVED: Adjustable Gradient filter

What is Luminar?

Skylum’s Luminar Neo is an all-in-one, full-featured photo editor.

Luminar is a fast, user-friendly standalone app that offers everything photographers need for photo editing. It’s available for users of both Windows and Mac.

Luminar has advanced AI-powered tools that intelligently make selective adjustments. For example, you can easily apply effects only to people using the software’s “human-aware” technology or quickly dramatize an expanse of sky without changing the rest of the image.

Additionally, the library management section lets you catalogue and organize your images (making it one of the most viable alternatives to Adobe Lightroom).

If all you need are powerful artificial intelligence editing tools, you may want to check out Luminar AI, reviewed here.

What is Affinity Photo?

Affinity Photo is a photo editing app from Serif. In their own words, it’s “the fastest, smoothest, most precise professional creative software” on the market.

Of course, there’s some debate about whether that claim is true, as we’ll explore below.

For now, let’s just say that Affinity does have a lot going for it.

It has powerful functionality for things like non-destructive photo editing, seamless photo stitching, HDR, and complex image composition.

Affinity Photo was originally developed for Mac only, but Serif has since released a Windows-compatible version as well.

Affinity offers plenty of editing tools and supports more than 15 file types. And while it includes all the simple editing functions you’d need, it also has the benefit of advanced functions as well.

One thing Affinity still lacks is DAM/cataloguing functionality. As such it works more as an alternative to Photoshop rather than to Lightroom.

Luminar vs Affinity | Conclusion

Both Skylum’s Luminar and Serif’s Affinity Photo are powerful, intuitive photo editing apps that offer good value for money.

If you’re looking for alternatives to the Adobe suite and want to avoid subscription fees, these two software programs can provide you with what you need.

Naturally, there are pros and cons to any app. But in the question of Affinity Photo vs Luminar, Luminar offers a few big advantages that get it over the line. It’s also the winner of the EISA image editor of the year awards for 2019/20 – more proof that you’ll be investing in a high-quality, popular product.

…and if you’re still unsure, here’s some good news: Luminar offers a 30 day money-back guarantee, and Affinity offers a free 10 day trial.

This gives you access to all the features, so you can fully test the software out for yourself.

Give them a shot – and you’ll quickly get a better idea of which one is right for you.

And if you still can’t make up your mind, check the differences between Affinity Photo and Photoshop – 2 other popular image editors.

Luminar vs Affinity comparison
Luminar 4

Affordable image editor with powerful features & regular updates. Great for all levels of photographer.

Check Current Price


  1. Randseed on June 17, 2021 at 2:27 am

    From what I’ve seen recently, Luminar 4 is now considered obsolete and replaced by Luninar AI. Many reviewers regard this as a step backward. They’re not as happy with it. In light of this, and Affinity’s half-price offer ($25 for a limited time), I think I’ll go with Affinity Photo.

    • Mark Condon on June 18, 2021 at 1:28 pm

      I wouldn’t say L4 is obsolete, Randseed – it offers several features that Luminar AI doesn’t. However, I do foresee it being merged into Luminar AI sometime in the future.

  2. Hans Gielen on November 5, 2020 at 11:39 pm

    Hello there,

    after growing bored with older Photoshop versions and unwilling to pay subscriptions I tried Affinity Photo AND Skylum Luminar AND Skylum Aurora HDR.

    After intensive testing I now found my dream team: Affinity Photo for all basic editing tasks and Aurora for HDR and effect stuff. Occasionally I revert to Photoshop when using some older filters.

    AI-based picture improvement in Luminar sounds wonderful but leaves the impression of not being in control of the process. The sky-replacement feature is nice but definitely crosses by boundaries of decency in photography. When shooting a boring sky, replace it with a wonderful sunset? Is this still MY photo then? Where will this stop? Having a photo of my wife cooking, then a one click AI improvement to a busty, long legged beauty on the Maledives? Tempting, but as a photographer: NO THANKS.

    If you actually NEED DAM (digital asset management), then maybe Luminar is the better choice. But if you have your own ideas about organizing your photos and just want a decent photo editor without any additional concepts forced on you, then go for Affinity. Especially for former Photoshop users there is no steep learning curve.

    When I look at the money I spent on bodies/glass and PC hardware, prices for Affinity/Luminar/Aurora/… are negligible, so my serious advice: get all of them, do lots of edits with all of them and keep whatever you like.

    These comments are from an amateur for amateurs, in case you are a professional I am sure you don’t need my opinion about your workflow and tools.

    Keep shooting and keep editing to everyone :)

    • Kingsley Pouponeau on April 20, 2021 at 9:03 pm

      Thank you Amateur from another amateur.
      You put my mind at rest but one question;
      Do I need Aurora HDR or can I get by with Affinity Photo HDR?
      Make it two questions :
      I want to use Affinity Photo for a composite project (already done the research) but the problem is with the raw dev’t persona. Once I leave it, it leaves me…no going back after a rethink. In your experience, how does Luminar 4 treats RAW. I am an amateur. I’ve dabbled in pirated copies of Lightroom & Photoshop but now I want to do it the right way…already bought Affinity Photo….Darktable is too much for me. Thank you & Blessings

  3. qianwan on April 27, 2020 at 5:25 pm

    Affinity Photo I s great for quick and easy photo editing, and moderate illustration and photo compositing. Affinity Photo also has far better performance than Photoshop, on my computer at least. I have a XP-Pen Deco 03 grapic tablet for Affinity Photo work (photo rectouching ) .
    Altogether, I think Photoshop will be the essential photo editing + illustration tool for the time being. But I don’t think it would hurt to invest in Affinity Photo .

  4. Dave on March 27, 2020 at 9:25 pm

    Great review.

  5. Russ on December 13, 2019 at 9:28 pm

    Used both Affinity and Luminar 3 but found none of them really upgraded there software to what I needed for images of birds, it’s OK saying you can replace a sky with one click but if you don’t need it then wasted your money, everyone in the field of photographic software development seems to think people only shoot Landscapes and People but we don’t. I ended up with Topaz software, good all round for what I need, good comms with there customers, and if you wait for special times of the year you can get big discounts not the 15% offered by many of the others.

    • Mark Condon on December 14, 2019 at 7:41 am

      Fair enough! Glad you found the right software for your needs, Russ.

  6. MoWe on December 6, 2019 at 11:17 pm

    One big note on the theme of customer support. Skylum seems great at first but they are really good at providing updates for limited amout of time, than publishing a new version, which you have to pay for and never releasing updates again for the old version. That wouldn’t be a problem, if the basics would work and you would be able to decide wether to purchase the new version because you want the features or not. That isn’t the case though! Luminar 3 is a slow mess on windows and just a fraction better on Mac OS. It is nowhere near a finished product and instead of fixing the issues in Luminar 3, they sell you a new Luminar 4 with some headline features and the same old problems.
    I purchased one a liked it very much, got my father in the boat for Version 2 and hoped for the DAM in Version 3. The DAM isn’t a DAM, its a file browser and a clumsy and slow one at that. I tried Version 4 and it is the same slow mess. What good does it do to me to replace a sky, when I need five hours to get through a set of 200 holiday pictures just for the rating a basic edits? My old Lightroom 5 is so much faster, that I have already questioned myself. By the way, I’m on a modern, fast laptop, not some old lump.

    So beware before you buy and try it with a full size library!!!

  7. Gilbert C. Pogany on November 16, 2019 at 8:33 am

    I read the comparison with considerable interest since I have used Affinity for over a year and recently acquired Luminar 4 but I have to disagree with some of the advantages conferred to Luminar. For one, some of the Luminar tools are not readily accessible. For example, the Clone & Stample is a separate window and is only accessible with key CTR J. I got this information only from an online info and not within Luminar. Also, I accessed the History panel in Luminar and lost all of my lengthy previous work. I could never undo this and had to restart from scratch. However, the sky replacement tools are excellent and well worth purchasing Luminar. As a general processing app it is clumsy and needlessly difficult to use since the tools are not readily visible. For that purpose, I consider Affinity far superior.

Leave a Comment


Enter your email to be sent
today's Welcome Gift:
19 Photography Tools

🔥 Popular NOW:

Shotkit may earn a commission on affiliate links. Learn more.